Browse Forums Building A New House 1 May 30, 2023 5:08 pm Like ⋅ Add a comment ⋅ Pin to Ideaboard ⋅ Hi All, see above image. The required setback from the rear boundary in my case is 5m, as you can see the shape of the site and location of the boundary is slightly unique. I understand the setback in two ways, firstly (the way I originally thought), was to offset the "rear" boundary by 5m, and extend it till it intersects with the 1.55m side boundary (Yellow Line). After speaking with an ex certifier today, he is quite confident that the Blue line is the correct solution (offset the rear boundary 5m, however its influence stops perpendicular to its end point, i.e. the blue dotted lines) I will try to engage a certifier earlier than usual, however if anyone has any insight/experience with this in the past some advice would be much appreciated. Cheers, DC Re: Rear setback confusion for NSW CDC Housing Code 2May 16, 2024 9:16 am hey nedket, We have a similar lot like yours . just wondering how is it going with your DA application, is the Blue line is the correct solution (offset the rear boundary 5m, however its influence stops perpendicular to its end point, i.e. the blue dotted lines) Building Standards; Getting It Right! I found https://treenet.org/resource/tree-prote ... -it-right/ which states if tpz encroachment is greater than 30% then do not proceed. My question then is, is this… 1 12385 Yes . But I find the measurements debatable. The measured point is not the maximum height as seen on the picture. 2 6362 |