Browse Forums General Discussion Re: Builders Collective petitioning for a Royal Commission 23Jul 17, 2019 9:29 am 3in1 Supadiverta. Rainwater Harvesting Best Practice using syphonic drainage. Cleaner Neater Smarter Cheaper Supa Gutter Pumper. A low cost syphonic eaves gutter overflow solution. Re: Builders Collective petitioning for a Royal Commission 24Jul 17, 2019 9:49 am Designer,Engineer (Civil,Const & Envir),Builder,Concrete & Masonry Contract.Struct Repairs Re: Builders Collective petitioning for a Royal Commission 26Jul 18, 2019 9:46 am 3in1 Supadiverta. Rainwater Harvesting Best Practice using syphonic drainage. Cleaner Neater Smarter Cheaper Supa Gutter Pumper. A low cost syphonic eaves gutter overflow solution. Re: Builders Collective petitioning for a Royal Commission 35Aug 20, 2019 3:37 pm 3in1 Supadiverta. Rainwater Harvesting Best Practice using syphonic drainage. Cleaner Neater Smarter Cheaper Supa Gutter Pumper. A low cost syphonic eaves gutter overflow solution. Re: Builders Collective petitioning for a Royal Commission 38Aug 21, 2019 8:55 am An interesting take on the current construction crisis by Catherine Williams, a licenced builder (though she does also have degrees in civil engineering and law which can't hurt), appeared on the ABC today: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-08-21/ ... m/11431732 Basically she is taking aim at property developers who are swallowing the bulk of the profits from apartment building without having to be accountable in any way. (D)evelopers have made large profits through a combination of the housing bubble and a quirk in the regulatory system that treats high-rise and low rise developments differently.... Publicly available documents put the cost of (the Opal tower) development at around $215 million. Extrapolating the sale price where its 392 apartments were sold at between $800,000 and $2.5 million each, the developers have made a tidy profit on this project of around $165 million dollars, or a 77 per cent return on their investment. Or take the Prima Pearl skyscraper in Melbourne. The builder was paid $230 million, to build 680 "designer" apartments. Labour and materials worth $338,000 was used per home and each sold for an average cost of $1,000,000. Quite the tidy profit for its developer. Shame about the creaking. I'm not completely in agreement however with her assertion that when you buy a single-dwelling house and land package you will be dealing with a better-regulated builder - I would have qualified that adjective with the adverb "marginally". Re: Builders Collective petitioning for a Royal Commission 39Aug 21, 2019 12:51 pm The petition started by Andrew Burrell seems to be gaining enormous support - 19000 signatures so far. In the latest update he says the following: In the process of contacting various people with regard to my petition there have been comments that we do not need a Royal Commission (RC). Further that if the recommendations of the Shergold Weir Review (now 1.5 years old) were implemented in full then it would alleviate the need for the RC I am asking for. Food for thought ...... however ... My comment to this is that a Royal Commission could have many more powers to investigate and to legally compel people to testify, give evidence under oath etc, and also be made legally accountable. I am the first to say I am not an expert however it seems to me that there is at least one glaring omission in all of this: i.e. The role of the 'limited liability company' mechanism used in our corporations law to protect people from personally being accountable for their actions. I have been told that this concept is a pillar of our free market way of life. Question: When does a pillar become so damaging that we need to evaluate other approaches that put people before profit? This to me seems to one of the major causes of the situation we are in today. Consequently, I am undeterred in my quest for a RC, and it should be one of the major things to be explored in any terms of reference given to such a Royal Commission. See: https://www.change.org/p/gladys-berejik ... tm_term=cs Re: Builders Collective petitioning for a Royal Commission 40Oct 09, 2019 3:06 pm Liliana The petition started by Andrew Burrell seems to be gaining enormous support - 19000 signatures so far. In the latest update he says the following: In the process of contacting various people with regard to my petition there have been comments that we do not need a Royal Commission (RC). A lot of 'notable' (not able) pollies also fought tooth and nail against having a Banking Royal Commission. Perhaps those "various people" Andrew Burrell spoke to could recommend something else lol. The broken industry is a product of the failure of effective regulation and self regulation. "Various people" also promote that greater regulatory controls would increase costs. Many would beg to differ. 3in1 Supadiverta. Rainwater Harvesting Best Practice using syphonic drainage. Cleaner Neater Smarter Cheaper Supa Gutter Pumper. A low cost syphonic eaves gutter overflow solution. Look at your bill from the electricity company. It should detail the charges. You will need to do some estimating and some calculations. Then charge the… 8 4248 Site works are just about to start on our build with Blueprint in Midvale. viewtopic.php?f=31&t=106894 2 3953 Hi all, We are looking to build a new two storey house in western Sydney. Can anyone recommend a smallish builder to go with? We are trying to stay away from the big… 0 12145 |