Browse Forums Building A New House Re: The experience of building quality inspection 2Jul 24, 2014 1:25 pm 3in1 Supadiverta. Rainwater Harvesting Best Practice using syphonic drainage. Cleaner Neater Smarter Cheaper Supa Gutter Pumper. A low cost syphonic eaves gutter overflow solution. Re: The experience of building quality inspection 5Sep 19, 2014 2:39 am Hi Jack, Whatever you do ask about their disclaimers before you hire them or let them do work on your behalf, because some do not get on the roof, inside the roof and do not look at roof plumbing. They should also tell you what their definition of defect is and it must not be just a one liner, but spell out all the implied warranties and must cover lack of compliance with manufacturer specifications. Good Luck with that. Look on any reports you receive and the disclaimers will be there and so you can improve next time. Also when building consultants look at homes for a particular builder firm in some sort of regular arrangement don't you smell a rat. I do. Also see if the report has wording to the effect that the report is in keeping with the quality of the display home. If so, beware that clause. Defects are absolute, not conditional on a display home quality. It reeks of compromise. Leonardo_23 Hello, Whats peoples current experience building with Carlisle, specifically in SouthEast Melbourne? We are currently building in SE Melbourne and finding that quality… 0 9193 you need to understand the breakdown of warranties. 90 warranty is considered as minor defects rectification period where as the longer ones are more major/structural… 1 5319 I apologise for any confusion, but your understanding is correct. We approached our situation differently based on advice from… 11 53172 |