Browse Forums Building A New House 1 Oct 21, 2011 6:04 pm Hey all Just visited the site and saw two things that I have a question for. 1. Is the obvious nailing acceptable so the timber is supposed to be flush? 2. Is the horizontal timber supposed to be the same as the vertical frame timber? .... which I saw on the vertical frame that it is MGP10 and smooth and the horizontal just looks like ordinary ruff as bits of what ever 3. Im not supposed to be on site at all due to contract but ofcourse I do visit the site undectected ,If these are faults, am I able to bring these up with the builder or do I wait for my independent building inspector to raise the issue? Cheers Like ⋅ Add a comment ⋅ Pin to Ideaboard ⋅ By man_love at 2011-10-21 Re: FRAME: Is this accetable? 2Oct 21, 2011 6:25 pm noggins dont need to be of structural quality timber. The only issue is perhaps the "play' between the noggins and the stud. You are at least very lucky your builder is using MGP10 for the studs. Many use F5. Re: FRAME: Is this accetable? 3Oct 22, 2011 12:19 am You can always ask to go and look with the site supervisor and you can have your questions answered on the spot. If you are uncomfortable with what you are bring told you can always get an independent inspector in. Note that the builder will then try to extend the contract date due to delays waiting for the inspectors report. Chatz Re: FRAME: Is this accetable? 4Oct 22, 2011 9:27 am My site supervisor l 1 e d through his teeth and dismissed our gapped noggins as a none issue when i asked him about it, making me feel naive and stupid, because he knew we never built before, so I brought in my own independent inspector and exposed my site supervisor as a lier and a deciever. 13-08 Moved in 13-05 Build restart 13-04 VMIA compensation 12-08 Builder liquidation 12-03 Fixing 11-12 Lockup 11-11 Frame 11-09 Slab 11-09 Start 11-07 Contract 10-11 2K deposit 10-06 Titled land Re: FRAME: Is this accetable? 5Oct 22, 2011 1:50 pm zeitgeber My site supervisor l 1 e d through his teeth and dismissed our gapped noggins as a none issue when i asked him about it, making me feel naive and stupid, because he knew we never built before, so I brought in my own independent inspector and exposed my site supervisor as a lier and a deciever. so according to your independent inspector gaps in the noggins (such as my pic) goes against building code? Re: FRAME: Is this accetable? 6Oct 23, 2011 10:26 pm AE86 so according to your independent inspector gaps in the noggins (such as my pic) goes against building code? My independent inspector indicated on the report that 8 noggins were not tightly fitted between the studs. He didn't mention any violations of the BCA or Australian Standards, but my site supervisor promised to fix them. Here's an example of the gap in noggins. Gap is half the size of a 5 cent coin (I have 8 of these). Like ⋅ Add a comment ⋅ Pin to Ideaboard ⋅ 13-08 Moved in 13-05 Build restart 13-04 VMIA compensation 12-08 Builder liquidation 12-03 Fixing 11-12 Lockup 11-11 Frame 11-09 Slab 11-09 Start 11-07 Contract 10-11 2K deposit 10-06 Titled land Re: FRAME: Is this accetable? 7Oct 24, 2011 10:59 am instead of just saying " I don't think this meet the building standard" which in fact most of us probably don't know, you may say " I don't think this is holding up properly, can we have it fixed just for peace of mind." usually the builder will do it if you ask nicely. Welldoone Sorry to hear about your issues. Over the past 4-5 years I have inspected heaps of forum member's frames in my spare time and the non compliance issues with… 4 8888 Any advice re whether to use Cladding or House Wrap (both with flashing) on a house internal woodern frame that has a "void area" (i.e. underneath upper story, noting… 0 24529 Long time forum searcher first time asker. I've got this hideous aluminium frame for a front door and side windows. Is there a way or a product out there that could be… 0 2186 |