Browse Forums Building A New House 1 Jan 05, 2008 3:18 pm We have been looking at a particular home, which we absolutely love, however the base price is still a lot more than we wanted to spend. Is there anything that we could do to reduce the price at all, or because that is the base price we can't go any lower by excluding things etc... Re: Reducing the cost 2Jan 05, 2008 7:30 pm Hi Cooper,
One thing you CAN do is reduce the size of the house or garage. It also depending on the "standard" inclusion. Are ducted Aircond, ducted vacuum cleaning, evaporative, spabath, and other "luxury" included in your standard inclusion? If you exclude them you can have same saving, however, installing these features in the future will cost you more. Re: Reducing the cost 3Jan 05, 2008 7:31 pm There was a previous post about the difference from base price to typical build price and, from memory, the typical build price (site costs, typical upgrades, etc) was 1.5 times more than the base price. If you can't afford the base price, you're pushing the proverbial uphill. Demolition August 2009, Construction Started September 2009, Completed December 2010 Re: Reducing the cost 4Jan 06, 2008 3:58 am Set a realistic budget and try and stick to it. As Casa mentioned most of us end up exceeding the base price.
Look for a cheaper house or increase your budget ... but be realistic ... it is going to cost more than you expected in the first place. Sometimes cheaper homes dont necessarily save you money in the end ... particularly if you are upgrading lots of items. Re: Reducing the cost 5Jan 06, 2008 7:24 am Some building companies will reduce the cost if there are things you are willing to do yourself, such as flooring, the kitchen, or whatever. It might be cheaper to do such things yourself, it might not. Some companies include window treatments, fly screens, etc. (not many, though) so perhaps savings might be made in that area if you're willing to wait for blinds for a while!
The standard house plans are just that - standard, and the displays of the houses one likes are usually filled with all sorts of yummy extras, so oftentimes thinking of something to get rid of can be difficult! If even the base version of a particular plan is over your budget, are you able to consider a similar plan, one that is perhaps a square or two smaller, so you can have all the bells and whistles you want? It depends on what is more important to you: the size or the asthetics. We are going for a house two squares smaller than we originally wanted as we want the frills over the size, so we're going to expand on our alfresco area a few months later. The house itself will be a good size (31 sq, inlcuding an averagely-sized alfresco) but we want a BIG alfresco, so we'll add to it after a few months of further income LOL. Think where you can cut down and, if need be, look at a slightly smaller plan so you can get the quality you want. Don't know if I've helped - there are others here on this forum who are better qualified to advise, I'm sure! Fiona Re: Reducing the cost 6Jan 06, 2008 7:59 pm Thanks everyone!
It's not that we can't afford the base price, thats not a problem, we just didnt want to have to spend that much!! It's just that the house includes a few things that we could do without, and i wasn't sure whether there was any negotiating on reducing costs from what they class as a base price. Re: Reducing the cost 7Jan 07, 2008 3:30 am ![]() Thanks everyone! It's not that we can't afford the base price, thats not a problem, we just didnt want to have to spend that much!! It's just that the house includes a few things that we could do without, and i wasn't sure whether there was any negotiating on reducing costs from what they class as a base price. You can usually negotiate on reducing costs by removing certain items i.e. underfloor heating, do the flooring, airconditioning and lighting yourself, etc. I know what you mean by not wanting to spend too much ... no one does. Ask the Salesperson if you can take out certain non essential items. You will probably find more inclusions later down the track that you simply MUST have!! Re: Reducing the cost 8Jan 07, 2008 8:18 am But be careful in trying to reduce costs by removing things.
For example, the Porter Davis/Eden Brae Windsor 46 - a great home but for all of it's 4 bedrooms there are ensuites and WIRs. The bathrooms themselves are worth about $5-7k of fixtures, fittings, tiles etc. However, if you ask them to remove a bathroom - you only will get $3k knocked off the price. So removing parts of the house may not save you as much as you might hope. Re: Reducing the cost 9Jan 07, 2008 8:43 am There us only two approaches I know that work.
One, make sure you are playing with two builders so you can price one against another throughout the negotiating process and don't be shy about it. The second way does not suit everyone if you are connected and get trades you can ask for a shell price and finish it yourself. This can be easier than you think and is a nice compromise the banks will normally finance against an owner builder situation. HTH Re: Reducing the cost 10Jan 09, 2008 11:12 am all you can do is ask we are doing the painting on our own house as my parents are painters that was worth $6000
we didnot like the mirrors in bathrooms and their fixs we are having no extras and no mod of plans as this all adds up we are doing own floor coverings and their price for carpert was over 5,000 and we could get it done for 3,000 builders have a 10% to 20% mark up on their items Re: Reducing the cost 11Jan 10, 2008 10:49 pm Careful, you may find that when deleting standard items the builder will only credit back cost only.
For example: The builder may charge you $60 (cost + gst + margin) for a standard light point when adding more. But if you were to delete a standard light point you would only receive a credit of $35 (cost only). Hence, deleting heating and cooling items doesn't always work as volume builders usually have a greater buying power than an individual. The credit that you get back may not actually save you anything if you cannot purchase it at a better rate. Most find that the credit they get only covers the purchase of a cooler or a heater not both. Food for thought. Hennig Re: Reducing the cost 12Jan 12, 2008 6:48 pm whats the difference if you donotwant their items or donot like them.We found that has not been the case with our builder I know they have a mark up their items it says so on the contract and my cousin is a builder everything is not always cheaper through the builder Re: Reducing the cost 13Jan 12, 2008 8:51 pm That's a fair call.
I agree, there are some items that we can purchase for as good as a builder - in many cases they are not offered in the standard house/price. But it's not really the nickel and dime stuff of saving $30 here and $40 there that is going to do the trick. To effectively reduce the costs you are more than likely going to look at the big ticket items (heating and cooling). I haven't seen too many cases where an owner has been able to delete out these items (credit of say $5.5k - $6k) and then be able to replace them for the same or less (supplied and installed). Sorry, getting off track of this string. Base price for many builders will not include complete site costs - unless you're building on a flat 700m2 block with an 'M' class soil, which is quite rare - due to the way developers are leaving sites. H Yeah ours done in Canberra was $240/sqm back a few months ago, but they apparently have gone up over $350/sqm now. And yeah if using stone etc they add in the capping… 5 4052 The reason that double glazed windows perform so well as insulators is not in the glass, it is in the airgap. https://www.homeone.com.au/articles/doo ...… 20 9041 ![]() Hi All, Need some help/advise from community here. We are planning to buiild double storey at StoneHill, Maddingley. The lot has 600mm fall, Henley quoted 34k site cost,… 0 1182 |