Browse Forums Heating, Cooling & Insulation Re: Evaporative cooling vs Split system 22Oct 30, 2017 5:26 pm Our build thread viewtopic.php?f=31&t=82369&p=1525857&hilit=fairhaven#p1525857 Re: Evaporative cooling vs Split system 30May 05, 2018 4:36 am RC56 My husband and I are building Delta 25S with Metricon in Melbourne. We recently had our colors appointment and next week we have our electrical appointment. We are stuck with the decision making for Evaporative cooling. Many people suggest us its not worth it and people land up getting a split anyway. I have read reviews that it doesn't work above 30 degree temperature, there is always a wet feeling in the house and furniture. Any suggestions anyone?? What is better- cost effective and usage wise? Split Systems Split systems will work in any climate and if you live in a humid climate they will be the best option Buying a split system can be more affordable because you can add additional units to some systems or install additional units as your budget allows In this case, repair costs can also potentially be lower. If one unit breaks down it can be repaired seperately and the others continue working Replacement costs can be lower, although this is not always the case, this is very dependend on the individual installation Evaporative Cooling Increases humidity in the house They are less effective when humidity is high outside Generally require slightly more maintenance than air conditioning Consider carefully before purchasing in water restricted areas or where dependant on limited water as water consumption can be up to 80 litres per hour. If you made a decision enter here. Re: Evaporative cooling vs Split system 31Jun 16, 2018 7:49 am I have evaps in Brisbane and have been using them for 8 years. we also ended up installing splits in every room for the really humid or cold days. over time i have begun to realise that these systems are an advantage for your energy consumption if you learn when you can use them (using a humidity guage) as thety are much more effective than fans and use less energy than splits/ducted aircon. if used correctly they can be very effective in keeping your running costs down for your house, although the install cost of both systems may put you off. Re: Evaporative cooling vs Split system 32Jun 21, 2018 9:52 am Joker for melbourne generally, heating is more important, so as long as your ducts are the bigger type, you use your heating ducts for add on air con, we would use heating at least twice, maybe three times more in geelong, Melbourne areas, most here get gas central heating, and if you preplan and have the bigger ductwork needed for aircon, it is simple to add on air-conditioning, house is 48 square, garage not air conditioned, rest of house has 4 zones with actron add on air con,, 17 kW system, does house easily, never need more than 3 zones on at a time, our windows are thermally broken and double glazed, also have solar, which means when we are using our air conditioning, generally after work and on weekends, we are mainly using our own electricity, which makes air-conditioning really cost effective to run, and works really well, all the time RC56 Therefore, we got inclined towards refrigerated cooling. the price quoted for it was: Gas heating and electric cooling (Braemar)- $13000 (No zoning) Electric heating and cooling (Actron air)- $13500 (includes 2 zones) Now the point is we were suggested to go for the Electric heating and cooling option by the sales guy as he says- the way things are going electricity prices are going to be cheaper than gas prices in future. This really turned our head upside down. Not sure if this is and old age thinking but isn't gas cheaper than electricity? Any suggestions on this one? Gas heating/cooling vs Electric heating/cooling?? I certainly wouldn't be installing gas heating. It's become more expensive to run than reverse cycle air conditioning, with costs only expected to climb higher. Unlike reverse cycle air con, these costs cannot be reduced with a solar PV system. Add to the fact that it's bad for the environment, & this won't improve. Currently electricity production is very bad for the environment, but this will improve as we move towards renewables. As technology advances reverse cycle air cons are becoming extremely efficiently heat sources. Running costs will be lower than a gas heating, particularly if you have solar PV on the roof. Personally, I'd forgo any gas in the house, & build an all-electric house. Removing the gas bill, & its daily service charges, will save money. Instead of installing two separate, expensive systems for heating & cooling, I'd be installing a reverse cycle air conditioning system that does both. I'd be investing the savings in a roof top solar PV system, that will reduce the operating costs of both your heating & cooling needs. Re: Evaporative cooling vs Split system 33Jun 21, 2018 10:13 am AJW Only issue with Canberra with reverse cycle is heating the heating effect is marginal on the very cold winter mornings. The units can spend more time defrosting than they do heating. Our struggles below about -5. Great strides have been made in heat pump technology (of which reverse cycle air conditioning is a type) over recent years. Many highly energy efficient (Passive Haus) houses in North America, even in frigid Canada, use mini-splits as their only heat sources. These systems can operate efficiently far, far below zero C. Yes, due to the way they work (extracting heat from the ambient air), heat pump efficiency will decrease as the ambient temperature decreases. But nowhere near as much as was the case only a few years ago. This is because older systems required an extremely energy inefficient electric element to defrost their coils, modern systems do not. Though not all systems are created equal, only some are optimised for low temperature use (like Mitsubishi Hyper Heat). So it's worth doing your research before installing an AC system for heating in cold climates like Canberra or the alpine. Re: Evaporative cooling vs Split system 34Jun 22, 2018 1:30 am ddarroch AJW Only issue with Canberra with reverse cycle is heating the heating effect is marginal on the very cold winter mornings. The units can spend more time defrosting than they do heating. Our struggles below about -5. Great strides have been made in heat pump technology (of which reverse cycle air conditioning is a type) over recent years. Many highly energy efficient (Passive Haus) houses in North America, even in frigid Canada, use mini-splits as their only heat sources. These systems can operate efficiently far, far below zero C. Yes, due to the way they work (extracting heat from the ambient air), heat pump efficiency will decrease as the ambient temperature decreases. But nowhere near as much as was the case only a few years ago. This is because older systems required an extremely energy inefficient electric element to defrost their coils, modern systems do not. Though not all systems are created equal, only some are optimised for low temperature use (like Mitsubishi Hyper Heat). So it's worth doing your research before installing an AC system for heating in cold climates like Canberra or the alpine. The electric elements were used in the discharge air stream when the system cycled into defrost to defrost the coil so as to not blow cold air into the conditioned space as defrost mode essentially switches to cooling. You're confusing air conditioning with low temp refrigeration which uses electric elements for periodic defrost cycles. when its windy, your house will make all sorts of noises, whistling and all, from all sorts of places, unless it was built fully sealed like a Passiv Haus. 1 5561 Hi All, Our current 16 year old ducted gas heating is broken and needs an urgent replacement and appreciate any advise from the industry experts to make a decision for… 0 14160 2 12546 |