Browse Forums Landscape & Garden Design Re: Retaining Walls 14Oct 15, 2010 8:37 pm http://img820.imageshack.us/i/11316470.jpg/ http://img709.imageshack.us/i/79803505.jpg/ http://img163.imageshack.us/i/50278033.jpg/ http://img508.imageshack.us/i/12407669.jpg/ http://img230.imageshack.us/i/59616696.jpg/ http://img821.imageshack.us/i/86019349.jpg/ http://img508.imageshack.us/i/24198963.jpg/ http://img408.imageshack.us/i/67544390.jpg/ -- Have attached some photos -- http://img709.imageshack.us/i/81983780.jpg/ Re: Retaining Walls 15Oct 15, 2010 9:12 pm Im no expert but I've done a retaining wall using universal column section (H Beam) and sleepers and I'm currently doing 45m of retaining walls using the wooden post system. I totally agree with what oohsam is saying. I personally think that the galv steel post option is great for boundary walls which you can't see such as when you are on the high side and can't actually see the exposed wall as it is easy and strong and also lasts. However for walls which you can see they are pretty ugly for the reason oohsam mentioned - the sleepers will warp alot. The pictures you have posted are pretty much indicative of what the H beam system looks like once the sleepers have warped. Its hard to see from the photos if the posts are all lined up as they should be but otherwise it all looks pretty standard - those sleepers are your typical H4 ironwood variety that is commonly used. It's a pitty that this has been used for retaining walls that are in a sense a feature of your property as they will allways be seen (unless you can grow plans in front of them). I definetly would have used the wooden posts as they keep the sleepers straighter and they look much more natural so that the imperfections of the sleeprs actually add to the look. Steel posts look like someone put mag wheels on a horse cart - it just looks wrong. The scoria gravel you posted a picture of is also the usual material used for the drainage system. If the sleepers are only 500mm in the ground however that is pretty *** poor. Re: Retaining Walls 16Oct 15, 2010 9:21 pm Hi Lex, I'm in Sydney if you want me to have a look Where you are coming from is where you are going to... Re: Retaining Walls 17Oct 15, 2010 10:00 pm Hey onc, thank you for your offer! I think you just want to meet me ... and maybe give me an obscene quote that I cannot not refuse We have two more quotees tomorrow (so far). Both sound like "serious" concretors and they deal with slabs as well as driveways. We'll see what comes out of that! Our site is more complicated since it's a total makeover and they apparently have to do the soft stuff in the backyard first (total turf replacement), some retaining walls at the back and only then do the concreting, then finish off front soft stuff/turf. And the soft landscaping guys have to communicate with the concreting guys Oh, and my favourite - the drainage !! My signature is distracting people from my wise posts ... Re: Retaining Walls 18Oct 15, 2010 10:17 pm Well the offer is there I'm only here til Tuesday... it is amazing what another pair of eyes and somewhat of a brain can do. Where you are coming from is where you are going to... Re: Retaining Walls 19Oct 16, 2010 2:10 am NCQG - The markings of the sleepers you have taken are not a big deal. Keep in mind, this is timber, and trees do not grow on a canvas and thus, are not identically perfect! In fact I think it adds character. The white stuff, and marks, are all from the flat pack, and the knots are just normal, so I wouldn't be getting upset at that. Ideally it would have been good to see more pictures of the actual wall instead of defected individual sleepers. I cant see any form of drainage behind those sleepers and am trying to work out why you needed a retaining wall int he first place. Its not retaining or holding anything up....if its to retain that dirt u have there...well you could have had the wall much further back. Anyway, too little to late now to be making those adjustments.... The reason the guy told you that 500mm into the ground is fine is simply because your wall has no force on it. Its a freestanding wall. There is nothing that it is actually retaining.... So unless there are more angles that I cannot see, there seems to be nothing really wrong with the wall. The sleepers will warp in there, as there is a gap, that's just something that is going to happen. Oh and as for drainage. I don't see a point in putting drainage. as no water will collect up...as, there is nothing that the wall is retaining for water to get trapped! Re: Retaining Walls 20Oct 16, 2010 7:18 am NcgQ http://img820.imageshack.us/i/11316470.jpg/ http://img709.imageshack.us/i/79803505.jpg/ http://img163.imageshack.us/i/50278033.jpg/ http://img508.imageshack.us/i/12407669.jpg/ http://img230.imageshack.us/i/59616696.jpg/ http://img821.imageshack.us/i/86019349.jpg/ http://img508.imageshack.us/i/24198963.jpg/ http://img408.imageshack.us/i/67544390.jpg/ -- Have attached some photos -- http://img709.imageshack.us/i/81983780.jpg/ I did consider fixing your pics so they would show in the thread but they come up quite large unless you select the thumbnail option and copy the code for forum. In which case they are a bit small as you can see by the example below. Like ⋅ Add a comment ⋅ Pin to Ideaboard ⋅ Render your bathroom walls, two opinions versus the one, makes you wonder. 3 6062 The spacing of the studs looks pretty large especially for a load bearing wall. 3 11116 Nope, only on the inside, I've literally has my ears to the brick outside and can't hear anything. I can sort of 'reset' the noise by pressing firmly on the studs. This… 10 11759 |